Share

One Year from Trump Order and Syrians in the Golan Face Threats to Freedom of Expression Amid Ongoing Settlement Expansion

March 25, 2020

On 25 March 2019, President Trump signed an executive order recognising Israel’s claim to sovereignty over the occupied Syrian Golan (‘Golan’) – territory in southwest Syria occupied by Israel in 1967 and later annexed in 1981 in a move the international community unanimously rejected.

In the subsequent period since Trump’s order, an emboldened Israeli government is not only seeking to cement its illegal occupation of the Golan, but also to silence those voicing concerns about human rights violations in the region.

Just over a week after Trump’s announcement, it was reported that Israel was pursuing a tenfold increase in its settlement population in the region while hoping to build 30,000 new settlement units. Not long after this, Israel announced plans for a new illegal settlement in the Golan named ‘Trump Heights’ to thank the President for his decision. Currently, there are just over 27,000 Israeli settlers living in 34 illegal settlements in the Golan– many of which are built on top of Syrian villages and farms destroyed by the Israeli army following the 1967 occupation.

In June 2019, an Israeli energy company, Energix, which is seeking to build wind turbines in the Golan, sued Al-Marsad under Israel’s controversial ‘Anti-Boycott Act.’ Al-Marsad – the only human rights organisation operating in the Golan – had the unfortunate honour of being the first organisation under Israeli control to be prosecuted by this law.

Energix’s lawsuit claims that Al-Marsad violated Israeli law through publication of a legal report and facilitation of public meetings regarding the legality of Energix’s wind farm project and its impacts on the indigenous Syrian population. Energix’s lawsuit is rooted in a controversial law that has been widely condemned for violating freedom of speech. The suit’s purpose seems to be to intimidate and silence Al-Marsad and others.

In a recent hearing for the suit in February 2020, Energix appeared eager to agree to a court suggested settlement that would have made Al-Marsad retract elements of its legal report while allowing the court to avoid addressing the question of the controversial Anti-Boycott Act. Al-Marsad, standing by the integrity of its work and in defense of fundamental human rights and freedoms of the indigenous Syrian population, including freedom of expression, rejected the settlement and will now defend its work on the merits. Al-Marsad hopes that this suit will vindicate its unique work in the Golan, slow Israel’s attempts to shrink space for civil society and dissent, and draw attention to the human rights abuses still taking place in the Golan.

One year on from Trump’s reckless and damaging order, the Syrian population in the Golan suffers from the consequences as an emboldened Israeli government has seized the opportunity to tighten its grip on the region it illegally occupies and side line its indigenous population. In fact, the Israeli government has been supporting Energix’s project, knowing well that it threatens Golani Syrians’ access to and use of their homes and farmland. Therefore, Al-Marsad calls on the international community – State governments, the United Nations, civil society, and media – to continue to reject Trump’s recognition of the Golan as part of Israel and demand that the basic human rights of the indigenous Golani Syrians are protected.

Releated Posts


Oil and natural gas in the Occupied Syrian Golan, illegal exploitation by Israel as occupying power
According to the Law of Occupation, Israel being the occupying country, has the legal obligation to act as just administrator of public property and natural resources. Nevertheless, at the beginning of 2013 Israel's Energy and Water Resources Ministry granted Genie Energy, an American-Israeli company, an exclusive licence to explore for oil and gas in a 153-square miles radius in the southern part of the Golan.
NEW PUBLICATION: EU’s guidelines on labelling of settlements products, situation in the EU and in some States Parties
Since the occupation began, the Israeli authorities have aimed to implement policies which control the valuable resources in the region, in particular the land and the water.
From Peaceful Demonstrations to Armed Conflict: Considering Humanitarian Intervention in the Case of Syria
The current conflict in Syria has developed from an excessively violent suppression of civilian protestors by Syrian State forces into an allout Civil War. Beginning in March 2011, the conflict has troubled the conscience of the international community.
Syrian Situation and the International Criminal Court, responsibility to referral and to investigate
Since the start of the Syrian civil war in 2011 the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity by both the government and pro-government forces and the anti-government military groups has continued to escalate, leading to the worst humanitarian crisis since the Rwandan genocide.
Impunity in Syria
Al-Marsad is currently drafting a discussion regarding the merits of a referral for Syria before the ICC, pursuant to Articles 13 and 15 of the Rome Statute, to demand international criminal accountability for crimes against humanity committed by both...